<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pushed Into a Corner, Craigslist Bites Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/20/pushed-into-a-corner-craigslist-bites-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/20/pushed-into-a-corner-craigslist-bites-back/</link>
	<description>Digital Policy in Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:02:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victory! &#171; CraigslistDen</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/20/pushed-into-a-corner-craigslist-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-30677</link>
		<dc:creator>Victory! &#171; CraigslistDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/?p=1198#comment-30677</guid>
		<description>[...] As did PolicyBeta (www.cdt.org) : presently we hear that McMaster is calling the Craigslist suit “good news,” which is befuddling because the S.C. taxpayers are likely going to have to pony big bucks to pay for the Craigslist legal bills (unless McMaster backs down right away), which can easily run $250,000 or additionally.  &#8220;The bottom line here hasn’t changed since McMaster decided to start his gralsostalsoing: Craigslist is constitutionally protected from having liability for content placed on its site by users&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As did PolicyBeta (www.cdt.org) : presently we hear that McMaster is calling the Craigslist suit “good news,” which is befuddling because the S.C. taxpayers are likely going to have to pony big bucks to pay for the Craigslist legal bills (unless McMaster backs down right away), which can easily run $250,000 or additionally.  &#8220;The bottom line here hasn’t changed since McMaster decided to start his gralsostalsoing: Craigslist is constitutionally protected from having liability for content placed on its site by users&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow-Up: Craigslist pwns SC AG McMaster &#124; Spartanburg Spark: Because Spartanburg Matters</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/20/pushed-into-a-corner-craigslist-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-26740</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow-Up: Craigslist pwns SC AG McMaster &#124; Spartanburg Spark: Because Spartanburg Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/?p=1198#comment-26740</guid>
		<description>[...] protections for online service providers, McMasters will almost certainly lose, but not before taking as much as $250,000 out of S.C.&#8217;s public coffers for what amounts to a moralistic publicity stunt for a soon-to-be gubernatorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] protections for online service providers, McMasters will almost certainly lose, but not before taking as much as $250,000 out of S.C.&#8217;s public coffers for what amounts to a moralistic publicity stunt for a soon-to-be gubernatorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigslist blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Victory!</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/20/pushed-into-a-corner-craigslist-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-26709</link>
		<dc:creator>craigslist blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Victory!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/?p=1198#comment-26709</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As did PolicyBeta (www.cdt.org) : Now we hear that McMaster is calling the Craigslist suit “good news,? which is befuddling because the S.C. taxpayers are likely going to have to pony big bucks to pay for the Craigslist legal bills (unless McMaster backs down right away), which can easily run $250,000 or more. &#8220;The bottom line here hasn’t changed since McMaster decided to start his grandstanding: Craigslist is constitutionally protected from having liability for content placed on its site by users&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
