<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grandstanding Against Craigslist and Threatening Free Speech to Boot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/15/grandstanding-against-craigslist-and-threatening-free-speech-to-boot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/15/grandstanding-against-craigslist-and-threatening-free-speech-to-boot/</link>
	<description>Digital Policy in Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:02:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Elliot</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/15/grandstanding-against-craigslist-and-threatening-free-speech-to-boot/comment-page-1/#comment-26699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/?p=1144#comment-26699</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;If a prostitute advertises illegal services on Craigslist and then commits a crime, the &gt;&gt;prostitute may be guilty, but Craigslist is not.

Nothing about the john? Maybe Congress under Bush and Justice under Ashcroft included language in that legislation that exempts men who patronize sex workers contacted and contracted online....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;If a prostitute advertises illegal services on Craigslist and then commits a crime, the &gt;&gt;prostitute may be guilty, but Craigslist is not.</p>
<p>Nothing about the john? Maybe Congress under Bush and Justice under Ashcroft included language in that legislation that exempts men who patronize sex workers contacted and contracted online&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craigslist CEO demands apology &#124; ZDNet Government &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2009/05/15/grandstanding-against-craigslist-and-threatening-free-speech-to-boot/comment-page-1/#comment-26441</link>
		<dc:creator>Craigslist CEO demands apology &#124; ZDNet Government &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/?p=1144#comment-26441</guid>
		<description>[...] points to this piece by the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology that explains why Craigslist is immune to the threatened prosecution under Section 230 of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] points to this piece by the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology that explains why Craigslist is immune to the threatened prosecution under Section 230 of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
