<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Craigslist Win Good for Free Speech, But Court Creates Murky “Section 230” Precedent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cdt.org/2008/03/28/craigslist-win-good-for-free-speech-but-court-creates-murky-%e2%80%9csection-230%e2%80%9d-precedent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2008/03/28/craigslist-win-good-for-free-speech-but-court-creates-murky-%e2%80%9csection-230%e2%80%9d-precedent/</link>
	<description>Digital Policy in Process</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Intellectual Property Exception to &#8220;Section 230&#8243; Should be Narrowly Interpreted</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2008/03/28/craigslist-win-good-for-free-speech-but-court-creates-murky-%e2%80%9csection-230%e2%80%9d-precedent/#comment-5898</link>
		<dc:creator>PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Intellectual Property Exception to &#8220;Section 230&#8243; Should be Narrowly Interpreted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/2008/03/28/craigslist-win-good-for-free-speech-but-court-creates-murky-%e2%80%9csection-230%e2%80%9d-precedent/#comment-5898</guid>
		<description>[...] explained in an earlier blog post , the main provision of Section 230 aims to protect online service providers and other Internet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explained in an earlier blog post , the main provision of Section 230 aims to protect online service providers and other Internet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
