<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Excellent Opinion on Broadcast Indecency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/</link>
	<description>Digital Policy in Process</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 10:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Supreme Court’s “Fleeting” Interest in the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-12664</link>
		<dc:creator>PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Supreme Court’s “Fleeting” Interest in the First Amendment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-12664</guid>
		<description>[...] order the Second Circuit to squarely address the First Amendment questions. The Court of Appeals ruled on APA grounds, but wrote several pages of legal “fluff” (also called dicta) that astutely addressed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] order the Second Circuit to squarely address the First Amendment questions. The Court of Appeals ruled on APA grounds, but wrote several pages of legal “fluff” (also called dicta) that astutely addressed the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Another Free Speech Victory Against the FCC</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-7356</link>
		<dc:creator>PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Another Free Speech Victory Against the FCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-7356</guid>
		<description>[...] benefit is increasingly an unpersuasive rationale. As CDT argued in amicus briefs to both Circuits, user control technologies are increasingly enabling parents to take control over what they and their children watch; and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] benefit is increasingly an unpersuasive rationale. As CDT argued in amicus briefs to both Circuits, user control technologies are increasingly enabling parents to take control over what they and their children watch; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Supreme Court Should Uphold Key Free Speech Decision</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Supreme Court Should Uphold Key Free Speech Decision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>[...] Second Circuit&#8217;s excellent opinion was a victory for free speech not only because of it struck down a troubling policy, but also because it acknowledged the fact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Second Circuit&#8217;s excellent opinion was a victory for free speech not only because of it struck down a troubling policy, but also because it acknowledged the fact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Bill Could Hasten Demise of FCC Indecency Regulation</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Bill Could Hasten Demise of FCC Indecency Regulation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>[...] are increasingly allowing individuals, including parents, to control what content enters the home. The Second Circuit said &#8220;technological advances may obviate the constitutional legitimacy of the FCC’s robust [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are increasingly allowing individuals, including parents, to control what content enters the home. The Second Circuit said &#8220;technological advances may obviate the constitutional legitimacy of the FCC’s robust [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Harris - Center for Democracy and Technology : A Key Victory for Free Expression</title>
		<link>http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Harris - Center for Democracy and Technology : A Key Victory for Free Expression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cdt.org/2007/06/07/132/#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>[...] words (such as in a live broadcast) -- would not lead to indecency determinations or fines. In a significant victory for free expression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently put a stop to the new policy, finding it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] words (such as in a live broadcast) &#8212; would not lead to indecency determinations or fines. In a significant victory for free expression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently put a stop to the new policy, finding it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
