FTC Should Address Google-DoubleClick Privacy Issues
May 29th, 2007 by Ari Schwartz
While the FTC cannot confirm that it has an ongoing investigation, it seems pretty clear from some public statements (See Steve Lohr’s article in today’s NY Times – “Google Deal Said to Bring U.S. Scrutiny”) that it is the FTC — and not the Department of Justice — that has taken the lead in reviewing Google’s merger with DoubleClick.
Some experts have suggested that privacy will not play a role in the FTC’s investigation, but CDT disagrees.
Consumer protection issues are not considered as factors in whether the DOJ or the FTC is chosen to review a merger. Rather, the agency that can demonstrate the most expertise on the competition issues at stake is usually the one selected.
However, once the Commission is selected, Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act can be part of the FTC’s review. All of the privacy actions that the Commission has brought to date have been under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The DOJ and FTC 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines specify that “mergers subject to section 5 are prohibited if they constitute an ‘unfair method of competition.’”
The FTC has used this power to investigate other consumer protection concerns, such as those that arose out of theAOL/Time Warner Merger in 2000.
As I mentioned in an earlier post on this topic, CDT has been promoting the FTC’s involvement in online advertising privacy issues since before either the Google-DoubleClick merger or Microsoft’s intended purchase of aQuantive were announced.
As I said then:
“Google, today, says that it has no plans to tie past history or search information across Web sites. Google says that it has no plans to match the DoubleClick cookies with any Google cookie. Yet, the possible integration of these two data sets – along with all of the other search data that Google collects – raises issues that the FTC could not have foreseen in 1999 and exemplifies the evolving privacy challenges in the online advertising space. It’s time to deepen the dialogue about behavioral targeting, and an FTC workshop would be a great way to start.”
We still believe that a workshop would be useful for the industry as a whole, but considering that the FTC did get review authority over the merger, we also hope that the FTC can get more assurances from Google in writing on their future plans regarding the privacy of user data.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 29th, 2007 at 2:53 pm and is filed under Consumer Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



July 5th, 2007 at 6:26 am
I personally don’t see everyone’s issue with search being more strongly linked to ad’s. What’s so harmful about them gathering that information? For those who (in my opinion, stupidly) ever click on ad’s, the ad’s will theoretically be better geared towards their likes. I have and have had an account with Google for several years, by now they’ve probably amassed more information about my likes than all my friends combined, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to take the advice of an online ad. Ever. Until online ad’s are made by my friends, specifically for me, and no one else to ever see, I might give them more then a one-second glance, but they aren’t, and never will be. Ignore them, never click on them, what harm have they done then?