Page Content | Main Menu | Section Menu | Support Us | Contact Us
Center for Democracy and Technology
Working for Democratic Values in a Digital Age
Support CDT
Contact Us
PolicyBeta - Digital Policy in Process
This Section

Stumping for Spyware Enforcement

July 6th, 2006 by Alissa Cooper

Last week I had the privilege to attend the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) Summer Meeting in beautiful Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. NAAG invites all of the states’ attorneys general and their staffs to gather several times per year to exchange ideas, learn about pressing issues in other states, and review the successes of state law enforcement. Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna moderated a panel on which I participated, the goal of which was to highlight the spyware enforcement work going on at the state level. The other panelists were Katherine Tassi and Aaron Munn from General McKenna’s office and Justin Brookman from the New York AG’s office.

Before beginning the panel, General McKenna urged us to make a “sales pitch” for state spyware enforcement. Thus far, only three states (Washington, New York, and Texas) have filed spyware lawsuits, and our goal was to convince the other attorneys general in the audience that they should join the fight. CDT is strong supporter of growing the pool of spyware litigants by getting more states involved. In our experience, getting started with spyware forensics does not require a huge amount of technical skill or a large budget, and in speaking to the attorneys general I sought to convince them that they too could get started with only minimal resources. New York’s experiences reaffirmed this idea – they received one of the largest spyware settlements to date ($7.5 million from Intermix) using a fairly low-tech setup. We published a recent report on this very subject.

While it was clear to me from attending the meeting that the states’ attorneys general have a lot on their plates, it was nice to see a few of them show interest in spyware litigation. The more we can get the word out by participating in educational events like the NAAG panel, the better off we will be in terms of ridding the Internet of this electronic scourge.


This entry was posted on Thursday, July 6th, 2006 at 5:14 pm and is filed under Consumer Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

About the Blog

    PolicyBeta is a forum for CDT experts to discuss news and developments in the technology policy arena. Visitors are encouraged to comment on the blog or email the authors.

    Our goal with PolicyBeta is to foster thoughtful discussion regarding technology policy as it relates to civil liberties and democratic values. While we encourage comments, we must insist that they be focused, relevant and written in a tone that is respectful of other posters. For more information, please feel free to contact PolicyBeta editor Brock Meeks.

    Check the main CDT site for complete, up-to-date information on CDT initiatives and activities.

Search Blog
       Top
Privacy Policy | Feedback